close



2015年02月01日 13:42



記者吳家寧/綜合報導

好萊塢男星羅素克洛(Russell Crowe)過去憑電影《神鬼戰士》奪下奧斯卡影帝,魁梧身材迷倒許多人。在2014年基隆火鍋料宅配上映的電影《諾亞方舟》身材還保持ok,但近幾個月體態變化之大,日前現身片場,已經腫到讓人認不出他是誰。

▼羅素克洛花嘿噴!腫到沒下巴,身材「胖兩圈」變大叔。(圖/達志影像)

現年50歲的羅烤肉食材 高雄素克洛的新片《The Nice Guys》開拍,他日前現身加州片場,一身藍色牛仔打扮,襯衫下的啤酒肚明顯凸出,臉胖到幾乎和脖子連為一體,完全像是變了一個人,和同劇演員雷恩葛斯林(Ryan Gosling)站在一起,整個人硬是比對方大了1倍。

▼羅素克洛和同劇演員雷恩葛斯林站在一起,整個人硬是比對方大了1倍素食年菜訂購。。(圖/達志影像)

★圖片為版權照片,由達志影像供《ETtoday東森新聞雲》專用,任何網站、報刊、電視台未經達志影像許可,不得高雄火鍋推薦 平價部分或全部轉載!

烤肉食材推薦

(中央社記者尹俊傑北京3日電)美媒近期報導,中國大陸擬在南沙島礁和西沙永興島部署多型防空飛彈。大陸軍事專家尹卓批評這是外媒「炒作」,美國艦機威脅南海穩定,大陸部署防禦裝備「合理合法」。 美國福斯新聞近期引述美方官員談話報導,美國情報衛星資料顯示,大陸已運送近距離CSA防空飛彈(CSA-6b)和紅旗9遠程地對空飛彈系統至海南島,預料將轉運至南沙人造島礁和永興島。 尹卓接受大陸中央電視台採訪時表示,美軍轟炸機先前不遠萬里到南海「炫耀武力」,2個航空母艦戰鬥群在南海活動,隨時在南海保留龐大的海軍力量。 具少將軍銜的尹卓聲稱,大陸在此情況下採取「合理合法」的防禦措施是正常的,防空飛彈打不到美國,也不會威脅周邊盟國。只要他國不威脅陸控島礁安全,防空飛彈就不會發揮作用。 他還批評外媒炒作毫無道理,叫「只許州官放火,不許百姓點燈」;美國到處宣揚「中國威脅論」,但真正威脅區域穩定的卻是美國。 諸多跡象顯示大陸正在南海擴張軍力。研究南海問題的「亞洲海事透明倡議」(AMTI)2016年12月公布多張衛星照顯示,大陸在南海7座人造島礁上部署「近迫武器系統」(CIWS),疑似配備防空火砲。 大陸國防部對此表示,「必要的軍事設施」主要是用於防禦和自衛,是正當合法的。「比如說,別人在你的家門口耀武揚威,難道你還不能準備一個彈弓嗎?」1060103

2017-01-0503:00

CONFLICT OF INTEREST? One of the members of a committee investigating the NTU president is said to be a coauthor; another is a college dean he appointedBy Sean Lin / Staff reporterAcademics yesterday questioned the integrity of a committee tasked with investigating allegations National Taiwan University (NTU) president Yang Pan-chyr (楊泮池) was involved in cowriting forged scientific papers.Quoting NTU secretary-general Lin Ta-te (林達德), who said the five-member investigation committee includes two faculty members at the university, attorney Hsu Wen-hua (許文華) said that the two members are likely to be College of Life Sciences dean Min Ming-yuan (閔明源) and College of Medicine dean Chang Shan-chwen (張上淳).“Assuming I am right, these two men are not suited to serve on the committee,” Hsu said, citing an NTU rule governing cases involving suspected breach of academic ethics, which states the selection of investigation committee members should not constitute a conflict of interest.Chang and Yang cowrote five scientific papers between 2003 and 2006, for which Chang was either listed as the first author or corresponding author, while Yang was listed as the corresponding author on some accounts, he said.Min was appointed acting dean by Yang when NTU professor Kuo Min-liang (郭明良) — with whom Yang coauthored four problematic articles that are now being investigated by the committee — assumed the post of Kaohsiung Medical University vice president, Hsu said.Yang later chose Min over another university professor to fill the post of College of Life Sciences dean, Hsu said.Hsu also raised doubts about why Yang was able to tell the media the constitution of the committee, which included two NTU faculty members and three Academia Sinica members, saying that Yang could have rigged the appointment of committee members.NTU should have sent the papers in question to the journals that published them for verification, and at least one other established and objective third-party academic for review to ensure the investigation’s credibility, he said.Saying that Kuo retracted his paper from the Journal of Biological Chemistry last month after the academic fraud scandal erupted, NTU professor of psychology Huang Kwang-kuo (黃光國) accused Kuo of lying when he said he was innocent at a news conference on Dec. 20.Kuo filed a request to pull the paper, which was found by the journal to contain forged results shown in six duplicated images, on Dec. 7, and on Dec. 30, the journal issued a statement that it had been retracted, Huang said.Huang asked why Kuo had not repaid Yen Men-luh (嚴孟祿), a physician at National Taiwan University Hospital’s Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NT$6.73 million (US$208,617) Yen claimed to have lent Kuo between 2002 and 2014 to help Kuo pay a mortgage, referencing another academic scandal that broke last month, in which Kuo allegedly took the money in exchange for Yen to be listed as coauthor on 11 papers by his research team.He also called into question why Kuo had never mentioned the debt during his tenure as a then-National Science Council (now Ministry of Science and Technology) official, even though he was required by law to declare his personal wealth.Liu Yuan-chun (劉源俊), president of the Chinese-language Science Monthly, said that the academia puts too much emphasis on the number of citations an academic receives when promoting professors, which has tempted many professors to use their connections for them to be listed as coauthors or forge research findings to boost the number of their publications.In response, the university reiterated that the committee is run in an objective manner.The two colleges have met several times to review the papers, and the investigation results are to be submitted to an evaluation committee and an ad hoc committee for review on Friday next week, it said.The evaluation committee will be headed by NTU vice president Chang Ching-ray (張慶瑞) and will operate independently, it said.新聞來源:TAIPEI TIMES
2CD643C660DDFC10
arrow
arrow

    loweprisx6 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()